From spring+@pitt.edu Fri Nov 25 08:57:56 1994 Received: from pitt.edu by icarus.lis.pitt.edu (4.1/1.34) id AA05508; Fri, 25 Nov 94 08:57:56 EST Received: by pitt.edu id AA29183 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4.5 for spring@lis.pitt.edu); Fri, 25 Nov 1994 08:57:52 -0500 Received: via switchmail; Fri, 25 Nov 1994 08:57:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from teilhard.lis.pitt.edu via qmail ID ; Fri, 25 Nov 1994 08:57:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from teilhard.lis.pitt.edu via qmail ID ; Fri, 25 Nov 1994 08:57:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from Messages.8.5.N.CUILIB.3.45.SNAP.NOT.LINKED.teilhard.lis.pitt.edu.pmax.ul4 via MS.5.6.teilhard.lis.pitt.edu.pmax_ul4; Fri, 25 Nov 1994 08:57:34 -0500 (EST) Resent-Message-Id: Resent-Date: Fri, 25 Nov 1994 08:57:34 -0500 (EST) Resent-From: "Michael B. Spring" If-Type-Unsupported: send Resent-To: spring@lis.pitt.edu Return-Path: Organization: National Institute of Standards and Technology X-Sender: amr@linus.isoc.org X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 2.0.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 24 Nov 1994 17:41:52 -0500 To: Chick Hayden , iisp@dsys.ncsl.nist.gov From: Tony Rutkowski Subject: Re: Part 2 of IISP Meeting Sched, Org'n, Fee Sched. Message-Id: <9411241633.ab19900@linus.isoc.org> X-IMAPbase: 1249813034 1 Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1 Chick, >-> (b) 12 standards developing and >-> other organizations, and How are you defining these terms? ANSI has had it's own institutional definitions for these terms which have been fairly narrowly focussed and designed to promote ANSI interests in a decidely old world of standards development. There's nothing particularly wrong with this, exept if the USNII effort is designed to be truly broad and unbiased - particularly if there is NIST support - and if you want to really embrace the standards world as it exist today, then I think your terms and perspective on these matters must necessarily be institutionally neutral. Look forward to a dialogue on this. cheers, --tony