one of the Spring 2005 DIST Colloquium Series |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
“A Discussion on Ontology-Driven Information Systems" Friday, April 15, 2005 Abstract: In the traditional systems
modeling approach, the modeler is required to capture
a user’s view of some domain in a formal conceptual
schema. In doing so, the modeler follows an established
paradigm, such as object-orientation or entity-relational,
that is chosen in terms of the available programming
environment. Such an approach forces the modeler to mentally
map concepts acquired from the specific domain to instances
of abstractions available in his paradigm of choice.
This mapping is done informally and in an ad-hoc fashion,
thereby introducing inconsistencies and inaccuracies
that inevitably lead to conflicts between the user’s
concepts and the abstractions captured in the conceptual
schema. Looking for an answer to this problem, Guarino
proposed that those working on information systems should
make use of commonly held, formally defined ontologies
in the design, development, and use of information systems.
He named such systems ontology-driven information systems.
Nevertheless some authors disagree that the development
of IS based on ontologies is a new concept. Sowa uses
the work of Tsichritzis and Klug for the American National
Standards Institute (ANSI) to say that the concept of
using ontologies as the foundation for IS development
is an old idea. But one implicit concept in Sowa’s
argument is that a conceptual schema is the same thing
as an ontology. In this presentation we discuss the differences
between ontologies and conceptual schemas. In this context,
we not only try to clarify the distinction between ontologies
and conceptual schemas, but we also hope to contribute
to the ongoing project of understanding the nature of
ontology-driven information. Bio: Dr. Fonseca is an assistant professor
at the School of Information Sciences and Technology
at The Pennsylvania State University since 2001. He finished
his Ph.D. in 2001 with Dr. Egenhofer at The University
of Maine. His thesis covered the area of geographical
information systems interoperability providing a theoretical
basis for semantic interoperability. With his focus on
geographical information systems design, Dr. Fonseca
demonstrates how complicated processes can be integrated
to the benefit of users. His newly developed concept
of ontology-based GIS is highly interdisciplinary as
it brings together various research methods from artificial
intelligence, software engineering, and GIS. His research
on ontologies, currently funded by NSF and by an AT&T
fellowship, is marked by a capstone publication in the
Journal of the American Society for Information Science
and Technology in 2004. In the past year, Dr. Fonseca
gave presentations in two selected workshops, wrote a
chapter for a reference book in GIS, and reviewed papers
for four conferences and seven different journals. Dr.
Fonseca has served as a panel reviewer for NSF and as
a member of the Advisory Board for the online professional
Masters degree program in Geographic Information Systems.
Dr. Fonseca is currently teaching Introduction to IST
Research, in which he relates his research on Philosophy
of Science and Ontologies with specific questions in
IS research. |
||||
