State awards grants to SIS researchers
Hassan Karimi of the School of Information Sciences has
been awarded a one-year cooperative research and development
Agreement grant of $971,623 to maintain and extend the Technology
Resources Database and associated projects created by James
Williams and Ken Sochats in 1997. To date, those projects
have received $3.8 million in state money.
Karimi was awarded another state grant of $487,712 to support
curriculum development for a geoinformatics track in the
master of science in information sciences degree program.
It will focus on geospatial-related activities, including
geographic information systems, remote sensing and a global
positioning system. Combined with commitments from several
business partners, including Duquesne Light, Environmental
Systems Research Institute, Microsoft Corp. and others to
provide hardware, software, technical support and training,
the total value of the grant is $1.2 million.
A $298,877 grant awarded to Prashant Krishnamurthy supports
curriculum development for a wireless information systems
track in the master of science in telecommunications program.
The first of its kind, the new track emphasizes a systems
perspective in the development, design and deployment
of wireless information networks.
NIH awards grant for oral health study
Walter A. Bretz, an assistant professor of restorative
dentistry and epidemiology, has received a $1.08 million
National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant for a mother-child
oral health study in the United States and Brazil.
Investigators at the Universidade de Sao Paulo at Bauru
and Pitt's School of Dental Medicine and Graduate School
of Public Health will study the use of combination therapies
(fluoride and chlorhexidine varnishes, xylitol chewing
gum, and oral hygiene instructions) in mothers, to reduce
the numbers of bacteria in the mouth that cause dental
caries prior to the emergence of their babies' teeth.
The NIH's National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial
Research awarded the grant.
Frequency of chlamydia screening in sexually
active teens found to be inadequate
Two-thirds of doctors do not perform recommended chlamydia
screenings on sexually active young women, according to
a study by Pitt's Center for Research on Health Care,
published in the March issue of the Journal of Adolescent
Health.
Failure to detect chlamydia can lead to pelvic inflammatory
disease, infertility, ectopic pregnancy and chronic pelvic
pain.
"Our results show that adherence to recommended
screening procedures is alarmingly low. Physicians may
need to be educated about the disease and the need for
chlamydia screenings in all sexually active young women.
If measures aren't taken, many young women's reproductive
health could be jeopardized," said Robert L. Cook,
a Pitt assistant professor of medicine.
Chlamydia is the most common bacterial sexually transmitted
disease in the United States; almost every major medical
association recommends that sexually active young women
get tested yearly for the disease.
Depending on the setting, anywhere between 1 percent
and 20 percent of sexually active young women have chlamydia,
with an average of about 3 percent; 80 percent show no
symptoms. Even if the prevalence is low, screening has
been shown to be clinically useful and cost-effective.
Cook and his colleagues surveyed over 800 primary care
physicians in Pennsylvania. Participants were given a
case study asking what tests they would conduct during
a routine gynecological exam of a sexually active 19-year-old
woman, who indicated no symptoms.
Only one-third of the physicians indicated they would
test for chlamydia, according to the study. Female physicians,
physicians in public clinics and academic settings, physicians
in metropolitan areas and physicians with a large proportion
of minority patients were more likely to screen for chlamydia.
The study also found that physicians were less likely
to screen their patients for chlamydia if they believed
that the majority of their 18-year-old patients were not
sexually active or if they believed the prevalence of
chlamydia is too low to make screening useful.
"It's a startling misconception among some doctors
that their young patients aren't sexually active or wouldn't
be exposed to the disease. Sixty-five percent of 18-year-old
women have had intercourse and chlamydia is frequently
detected across all populations," Cook said.
According to the study, screening for chlamydia prevents
pelvic inflammatory disease, lowers the prevalence of
chlamydia in a population over time and may reduce the
risk of acquiring HIV infection. Current U.S. health care
costs attributed to chlamydial infections exceed $2 billion;
screening could significantly reduce this amount.
Prof receives 2-year grant The Lupus Foundation of Pennsylvania
has awarded a $60,000, two-year grant to M. Ilyas Kamboh,
a Pitt professor of human genetics and psychiatry, for
the study, "Prothrombin Gene Variation and Risk of
SLE and Thrombosis."
Autoantibodies called anti-phospholipid antibodies (APA)
in lupus patients are associated with thrombosis, atherosclerosis,
fetal loss and low counts of blood platelets. The genetic
bases of both lupus and APA are not clear.
Kamboh's study will investigate the role of a gene called
prothrombin in the production of APA and the occurrence
of lupus. Successful completion of the study is expected
to improve understanding of the genetic bases of lupus
and APA.
Genetic testing can predict beta blocker effectiveness
The effectiveness of beta blockers in improving the survival
of congestive heart failure patients can be predicted
by genetic testing of the angiotensin converting enzyme
(ACE) gene, according to a Pitt study published in the
March 27 issue of Circulation, a publication of the American
Heart Association.
Beta blockers are drugs used to treat congestive heart
failure, a progressive disease in which the heart's muscle
is weakened after injury from a heart attack or high blood
pressure and gradually loses its ability to pump blood.
Previous studies have shown that beta blockers are more
effective in some patients than in others.
Many important genes occur in the general population
in multiple variations (or alleles), some of which may
alter how the gene functions. A common variation of the
ACE gene, the "ACE-D" or deletion allele, is
missing a small section of DNA. This results in patients
having higher levels of the hormone angiotensin II, which
raises blood pressure. In patients with heart failure,
higher levels of angiotensin II lead to a worsening of
symptoms by causing blood vessels to constrict, putting
an increased strain on the heart muscle.
"Despite this association between the D allele and
higher angiotensin II levels, its role as a cardiac risk
factor for heart failure progression remains controversial,"
said principal investigator Dennis McNamara, a Pitt assistant
professor of medicine and director of the heart failure
section at the UPMC Health System Cardiovascular Institute.
The study, called Genetic Risk Assessment of Cardiac
Events (GRACE), looked at the effects of genetic variation
on survival of patients with heart failure, particularly
the impact of genetics on the effectiveness of drug therapy.
The study followed 328 patients with heart failure due
to a weakened heart muscle for an average of 21 months.
Survey finds clinical trials industry
performing 'reasonably well' A new survey has found that
the clinical trials industry is performing "reasonably
well" but not exceeding the expectations of the public,
regulators or sponsors of clinical trials on a range of
important measures.
The survey was commissioned by Pittsburgh Clinical Research
Network (PCRN), an independently managed unit of UPMC
Health System. PCRN provides professional clinical trials
management services to industry sponsors of clinical trials
such as pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical device
companies.
PCRN commissioned the survey, the first in a new series
of "monitors" to track industry opinion on technical,
regulatory and consumer issues relevant to the conduct
of clinical trials, "in order to help contribute
to the increasingly informed debate on complex trials-related
issues," said Ronald B. Herberman, chairperson of
the PCRN board of directors, Pitt associate vice chancellor
for Health Sciences, and director of the University of
Pittsburgh Cancer Institute.
The survey was conducted by an independent New York City-based
opinion research firm and included over 100 detailed telephone
interviews conducted with 55 sponsors of clinical trials,
21 academic medical centers, 13 independent trials management
organizations known as contract research organizations,
as well as 13 regulatory authorities directly involved
in the oversight of trials conducted in the United States.
In the survey, respondents were asked to assess 16 aspects
of the clinical trials process -- more particularly, whether
the process in question had exceeded, met or fallen short
of expectations.
The survey found that few respondents think the clinical
trials community has exceeded expectations on any of the
dimensions explored. The highest response for "exceeded"
was 20 percent -- for protecting participants who enroll
in clinical trials.
Moreover, the professionals surveyed thought the clinical
trials community would do well to bolster the more consumer-intensive
aspects of the clinical trials process. Specifically,
77 percent thought the industry had fallen short in terms
of educating the public about the clinical trials process
in general, while 83 percent thought the industry had
fallen short in familiarizing the public with basic aspects
of the trials process such as how to enroll in trials.
In addition, 63 percent of the respondents felt the industry
had fallen short in terms of enrolling an adequate number
of patients in trials.
Respondents were more favorably disposed with respect
to professional trials-management issues, such as the
industry's efforts to monitor trial sites effectively:
74 percent thought the industry had met expectations in
this regard while 67 percent thought the industry had
met expectations in regard to protecting human subjects.
Herberman said that PCRN intended to revisit on an annual
basis the clinical trials performance measures it explored
in this survey.
Copies of the PCRN Monitor may be obtained by calling
420-3800 or sending an e-mail to panicj@msx.upmc.edu. |